The Lie Evolution

This title is acutally a title of a book by Ken Ham. We MUST think about evolution and not just accept it. Think deeper and question it. I find this topic surfacing in my mind once again.
If evolution has taken place our museums should be full of skeletons of countless 'transitional' forms. This is so obvious, and simple, yet it is NEVER a question that gets asked. We are so soon to accept a few mens views. Over one hundred years of intense searching only a small number of transitional candidates are touted as proof of evolution. If evolution has really taken place, where are the transitional forms? And why does the fossil record actually show all species first appearing fully formed, with most nearly identical to current instances of the species?
Even in the last few years I have noticed the BBC saying "Here is a scientist who has found a very rare fossil and this may be the 'missing link' and yet, none has been.. Don't you find it odd?
The idea - and this is all that it is, the 'theory' of evolution, proports that things develop by an (unguided) series of small changes, caused by mutations, which are "selected" for, keeping the "better" changes" over a very long period of time. How could the ability to reproduce evolve, without the ability to reproduce? Can you even imagine a theoretical scenario which would allow this to happen? And why would evolution produce two sexes, many times over? Asexual reproduction would seem to be more likely and efficient! I have taken some ideas from the Creation Science website - click on the title and be conused - if you are a believer in evolution! See also http://www.drdino.com/letting-god-create-your-day.php